NOTE: By submitting this form and registering with us, you are providing us with permission to store your personal data and the record of your registration. In addition, registration with the Medical Independent includes granting consent for the delivery of that additional professional content and targeted ads, and the cookies required to deliver same. View our Privacy Policy and Cookie Notice for further details.

You can opt out at anytime by visiting our cookie policy page. In line with the provisions of the GDPR, the provision of your personal data is a requirement necessary to enter into a contract. We must advise you at the point of collecting your personal data that it is a required field, and the consequences of not providing the personal data is that we cannot provide this service to you.

Don't have an account? Subscribe

An overview of the process-based approach in neuropsychological assessments

By Mindo - 18th Jun 2021

Irish Neurology Association 57th Annual Meeting, Virtual, 27-28 May 2021

The Irish Neurology Association (INA) 57th Annual Meeting took place on 27 and 28 May on a virtual basis. In the first session of Friday morning, Dr Alberto Blanco-Campal, Neuropsychologist at the Dublin Neurological Institute, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, was the guest lecturer in the neuropsychology seminar. Dr Blanco-Campal was introduced by INA President, Dr Donal Costigan.

The title of Dr Blanco-Campal’s presentation was ‘A process-based approach and principles of the diagnostic neuropsychological evaluation in dementia subtypes’. He aimed to provide an overview of his process-based approach to cognitive evaluation, which he noted would be useful for any clinician regardless of whether a brief screening or deeper evaluation is being utilised.

Dr Alberto Blanco-Campal

He explained that a cognitive evaluation is carried out in three stages – profiling the cognitive deficits, localising the neural bases of the deficits, and establishing a clinical and pathological association, which can be complex as different pathologies can be found without differences in clinical expressions. When interpreting test performance, Dr Blanco-Campal said it is of the utmost importance to employ both a quantitative exam with an analysis of the quality of the test performance. The quantitative analysis is data driven and measures how much a patient can do. This only reveals whether or not they are statistically normal or abnormal.

This, alone, is not enough, according to Dr Blanco-Campal. The qualitative analysis is more process driven and looks at how the patient performs the task, the nature of the errors carried out and aims to identify the cognitive deficit behind the error. Dr Blanco-Campal suggested that relying on only one element of this equation can result in flawed clinical conclusions.

To elucidate the way in which the nature of the deficit is analysed, Dr Blanco-Campal presented the use of satellite tasks, by example of the clock drawing command. Delegates saw three different clock faces, each of which was different in some way, reflecting three different underlying cognitive deficits. These underlying deficits are then linked using the MoCA-PA qualitative classification of errors subtypes. Dr Blanco-Campal’s group believe that this should be used in conjunction with a copy test, which can reveal distinct dementia subgroup patterns, which are not seen in the clock drawing command.

Dr Blanco-Campal also presented some core principles, which can help to guide diagnostic cognitive evaluation in dementia patients. Finally, Dr Blanco-Campal took a moment to mention how he and his colleagues attempted to maintain service provision through cognitive testing throughout the Covid-19 pandemic period. He explained that due to public health restrictions, tele-neuropsychology was the only option available to test patients either at their own home, or by attending a local hub.

However, even with technology optimised to reveal patient responses, this solution proved inferior to in-person testing, leading to reduced certainty in the team’s clinical judgement.

Leave a Reply

Latest Issue
The Medical Independent 20th February
The Medical Independent 20th February 2024

You need to be logged in to access this content. Please login or sign up using the links below.

Most Read