NOTE: By submitting this form and registering with us, you are providing us with permission to store your personal data and the record of your registration. In addition, registration with the Medical Independent includes granting consent for the delivery of that additional professional content and targeted ads, and the cookies required to deliver same. View our Privacy Policy and Cookie Notice for further details.

You can opt out at anytime by visiting our cookie policy page. In line with the provisions of the GDPR, the provision of your personal data is a requirement necessary to enter into a contract. We must advise you at the point of collecting your personal data that it is a required field, and the consequences of not providing the personal data is that we cannot provide this service to you.

Don't have an account? Subscribe

NCHDs expected by hospitals to work above EWTD-compliant rosters

By Mindo - 24th Apr 2019

NCHDs at some hospitals are being presented with rosters compliant with the European Working Time Directive (EWTD), but are “then being expected to work above those rosters”, according to IMO Director of Industrial Relations, Consultants and NCHDs, Mr Anthony Owens.

Speaking to the Medical Independent, Mr Owens said: “We are doing a round of EWTD meetings at the moment. What we are finding, I am afraid, is that doctors are being presented with EWTD-compliant rosters and then being expected to work above those rosters.

“So while the rosters are EWTD-compliant, the actual working hours are less so. We have been to Waterford, Cork [University Hospital], and we will be revisiting those hospitals. We have also been to Kerry, where there are fairly significant issues in even measuring the hours people are working at all.”

The IMO will be revisiting these sites, likely in late summer, he said.

“We have advised the hospitals — both ourselves and the HSE — that we will be back and we expect to be presented with figures that are actually an accurate representation of the daily lived experience of NCHD working hours.”

Asked if non-compliances mostly involved the 24-hour maximum shift, or 48-hour maximum working week, Mr Owens said “the bigger issue would seem to be on the 24 hours, in as much as, where people have a 24-hour shift, what tends to happen is, handover will bring you over 24 hours”.

He acknowledged this had been a concern for some time and “we will certainly be ramping-up the pressure on it. We suspect we will be involving the WRC [Workplace Relations Commission] in an evaluation of working hours.”

Mr Owens added: “What we have found is, in recent months, the reported figures have become greatly at odds with what NCHDs are reporting back to us… The nationally-reported figures are wholly at variance with what we suspect is the lived experience of NCHDs, which is why we have started revisiting sites again.”

Sites are being given an opportunity to address the matter and if this does not happen, “then we will have to consider our position and decide how exactly we want to tackle this”.

In 2013, excessive working hours resulted in a national NCHD strike, led by the IMO. 

Meanwhile, Mr Owens confirmed a new €10 million deal for NCHD training supports.

Leave a Reply

Latest Issue
The Medical Independent 20th February
The Medical Independent 20th February 2024

You need to be logged in to access this content. Please login or sign up using the links below.

Most Read