NOTE: By submitting this form and registering with us, you are providing us with permission to store your personal data and the record of your registration. In addition, registration with the Medical Independent includes granting consent for the delivery of that additional professional content and targeted ads, and the cookies required to deliver same. View our Privacy Policy and Cookie Notice for further details.

You can opt out at anytime by visiting our cookie policy page. In line with the provisions of the GDPR, the provision of your personal data is a requirement necessary to enter into a contract. We must advise you at the point of collecting your personal data that it is a required field, and the consequences of not providing the personal data is that we cannot provide this service to you.

Don't have an account? Subscribe

Media ‘lost run of itself’ on CervicalCheck

By Mindo - 21st Nov 2019

The HSE’s National Director of Communications Mr Paul Connors has said the media, with some exceptions, “lost the run of itself” in its reporting of the CervicalCheck controversy.

Mr Connors acknowledged that the HSE could not provide basic information in the early stages of the controversy. He said this was mainly due to the fact that CervicalCheck Clinical Director Dr Gráinne Flannelly had stepped down.

    “This thing was in chaos because we didn’t have this basic information, simple things like how many women were part of this, how were the women selected; we didn’t know,” he told the Medical Independent.

Mr Paul Connors

“The main reason we didn’t know was because the [CervicalCheck] clinical director, who had done a fantastic job in lots of respects, saved an awful lot of lives, had this information very much as part of her work and when she stepped down, we were missing that source of information. We were then cobbling together people who half-knew what she knew…while that was happening, all the damage was being done.”

Mr Connors said there were lessons for the HSE and the media arising from the crisis.

 “We have to work harder and ask the question, how do we get to the stage where, when you are reporting things, that you give some benefit of the doubt and listen to what we are saying? 

“Give us time to get the information so we can answer your questions, and not run off down a populist route of saying something is something when it isn’t.”

He said his influence as HSE Director of Communications did not hold sway with journalists during this time.

“Which was a pity, but it was such a ‘perfect story’ [for the media], an emotional story.” While acknowledging “the anguish” of the families impacted by the controversy, he said the media did not allow space for the HSE to find the relevant information. He said the central issues of concern became confused in much of the coverage.

Leave a Reply

Latest Issue
The Medical Independent 20th February
The Medical Independent 20th February 2024

You need to be logged in to access this content. Please login or sign up using the links below.

Most Read