NOTE: By submitting this form and registering with us, you are providing us with permission to store your personal data and the record of your registration. In addition, registration with the Medical Independent includes granting consent for the delivery of that additional professional content and targeted ads, and the cookies required to deliver same. View our Privacy Policy and Cookie Notice for further details.

You can opt out at anytime by visiting our cookie policy page. In line with the provisions of the GDPR, the provision of your personal data is a requirement necessary to enter into a contract. We must advise you at the point of collecting your personal data that it is a required field, and the consequences of not providing the personal data is that we cannot provide this service to you.

Don't have an account? Subscribe

HSE board questioned ‘very unusual’ NPHET governance structure

By Mindo - 17th Aug 2020

Pandemic concept, close up of scientist holdnig and analyzing planet earth

The HSE board expressed concern about the “very unusual governance structure” underpinning the national public health emergency team (NPHET) on Covid-19. The board raised questions in regard to a NPHET governance structure document which, according to meeting minutes, “creates a very unusual governance structure in which the HSE has to operate with the extensive oversight that NPHET itself and its subgroups are exercising on all aspects of the response to Covid-19.”

The document was published by the Department of Health after politicians called for greater transparency regarding how NPHET operates. A second edition was published in late June. According to minutes of a special Covid-19 HSE board meeting on 29 April, members also raised issues regarding lack of representation of patients/public/service-users on NPHET and its subgroups.

A HSE spokesperson noted that the board is the governing body of the Executive and is accountable to the Minister for Health for the performance of its functions. They referred to correspondence between the HSE and Department to ensure appropriate communication and consultation.
On 23 March, CEO Mr Paul Reid wrote to the Department’s then Secretary General Mr Jim Breslin outlining concerns expressed by the HSE board that its statutory governance role is respected. Mr Reid gave the example of an ethical framework for clinical decision-making during a pandemic. He said while the HSE was a participant in this NPHET/Department-led process, the board was right to expect engagement before policy guidance impacting the HSE was put in place.

On 20 April, HSE board Chair Mr Ciarán Devane wrote to then Minister for Health Simon Harris to suggest “improvements to the nature of the relationship between NPHET and its stakeholders, including the HSE”.
NPHET had “to a very large extent been highly successful as a process”, but it was clear to the board that operational requirements “have at times not adequately been considered at the centre of NPHET’s decision making”.

Responding to Mr Devane’s suggestions to improve matters, Minister Harris said alongside the Department’s Secretary General and Chief Medical Officer, he would meet weekly with the HSE Chair and CEO.
In his correspondence, Minister Harris also noted that the HSE was represented at every meeting of NPHET “at the highest operational levels, namely by the National Directors for Acute Operations and Community Operations and the Chief Clinical Officer in addition to other senior staff members of the HSE and these HSE staff members engage in the collective decision-making process, in line with the high standards of governance applied by the NPHET”.

Leave a Reply

Latest Issue
The Medical Independent 20th February
The Medical Independent 20th February 2024

You need to be logged in to access this content. Please login or sign up using the links below.

Most Read