NOTE: By submitting this form and registering with us, you are providing us with permission to store your personal data and the record of your registration. In addition, registration with the Medical Independent includes granting consent for the delivery of that additional professional content and targeted ads, and the cookies required to deliver same. View our Privacy Policy and Cookie Notice for further details.

You can opt out at anytime by visiting our cookie policy page. In line with the provisions of the GDPR, the provision of your personal data is a requirement necessary to enter into a contract. We must advise you at the point of collecting your personal data that it is a required field, and the consequences of not providing the personal data is that we cannot provide this service to you.

Don't have an account? Subscribe

Council team declined interviewing witnesses of alleged abuses in Bahrain hospitals

By Catherine Reilly - 05th Dec 2022

abuses Bahrain hospitals

A Medical Council accreditation team declined an opportunity to interview witnesses of alleged abuses at training hospitals used by the RCSI in Bahrain, a Gulf country with a widely criticised record on human rights and freedom of expression.

Bahrain is described as “not free” in Freedom House’s 2022 study of political rights and civil liberties worldwide.

Three witness statements were submitted to the Council by Global Legal Action Network (GLAN), an organisation of human rights lawyers and activists, in advance of the accreditation process at RCSI Bahrain and affiliated clinical sites. The accreditation process took place virtually in March 2021. The statements were “considered” as part of the team’s assessment, but it “did not consider it necessary” to interview the witnesses, the Council informed GLAN in June 2021.

The training hospitals – Salmaniya Medical Complex, Bahrain Defence Force (BDF) Hospital, and King Hamad University Hospital – have been linked with alleged mistreatment of political activists and prisoners, and discrimination against Shia Muslims.

According to handwritten notes of the assessor team’s meetings with students, released to GLAN under Freedom of Information law, the student feedback was mostly positive. However, there was reference to a “fear factor” about reporting potential ethical concerns at clinical sites.

The Council assessor team noted a much lower than anticipated level of student participation in these meetings, according to the accreditation report.

A Bahraini doctor, who submitted a witness statement to GLAN, told this newspaper that students would be afraid to speak out due to the political climate.

In late 2021, the Council granted RCSI Bahrain unconditional approval for five years. This is subject to a “confirmatory” site inspection under the hybrid process necessitated by Covid-19. The inspection of RCSI Bahrain and affiliated clinical sites took place in October 2022 and the report is being finalised.

The Council said the assessor team was “satisfied” with the information gathered from students during the virtual accreditation process and indicated that a lower level of student engagement was associated with the virtual process.

A spokesperson for the RCSI said the accreditation report provided feedback and recommendations for the university “to maintain the high-quality medical education it offers to its students”.

See news feature Eyes wide shut? Assessing the Medical Council on RCSI Bahrain (

Leave a Reply

Latest Issue
The Medical Independent 20th February
The Medical Independent 20th February 2024

You need to be logged in to access this content. Please login or sign up using the links below.

Most Read