NOTE: By submitting this form and registering with us, you are providing us with permission to store your personal data and the record of your registration. In addition, registration with the Medical Independent includes granting consent for the delivery of that additional professional content and targeted ads, and the cookies required to deliver same. View our Privacy Policy and Cookie Notice for further details.

You can opt out at anytime by visiting our cookie policy page. In line with the provisions of the GDPR, the provision of your personal data is a requirement necessary to enter into a contract. We must advise you at the point of collecting your personal data that it is a required field, and the consequences of not providing the personal data is that we cannot provide this service to you.

Don't have an account? Subscribe

165 active claims for alleged cervical cancer misreporting with SCA

By Mindo - 29th Apr 2020

The State Claims Agency (SCA) was managing 165 active claims in relation to alleged cervical cancer misreporting, as of 19 March last.

The number of claims related to CervicalCheck “has continued to increase through the first quarter of 2020”, according to the SCA.

The total active claims included 25 psychological injury claims from members of the families of the women concerned.

In a Supreme Court judgment on 19 March, the HSE, Quest Diagnostics and Medlab Pathology lost their appeal against a High Court decision in favour of Ms Ruth Morrissey arising from the misreading of her cervical smear tests.

The SCA appeal, on behalf of the HSE, related to the issues of ‘absolute confidence’ and primary and vicarious liability.

The Supreme Court found the HSE had a non-delegable duty in respect of patients accessing CervicalCheck.

The SCA said it welcomed the Supreme Court’s “clarification” of the position in relation to the ‘absolute confidence test’.

“The Supreme Court has confirmed that the High Court judgment of Mr Justice Cross is not to be interpreted as introducing a new test in clinical negligence cases.”

Meanwhile, the Chairperson of the CervicalCheck Tribunal, Ms Justice Mary Irvine, has recently asked for observations from interested parties as to how, once established, the tribunal might best operate whilst complying with medical advice and safety precautions as may be in place at any given time.

A person entitled to have a claim heard by the CervicalCheck Tribunal must initiate that claim within nine months of the date of establishment of the tribunal.

However, a claim cannot be made where the limitation period under the Statute of Limitations in respect of initiating those proceedings has expired.

The impact of the Covid-19 emergency as it relates to the periods of limitation for different classes of action under the Statutes of Limitations is under consideration by officials at the Department of Justice and Equality.

Leave a Reply

Latest Issue
The Medical Independent 20th February
The Medical Independent 20th February 2024

You need to be logged in to access this content. Please login or sign up using the links below.

Most Read