NOTE: By submitting this form and registering with us, you are providing us with permission to store your personal data and the record of your registration. In addition, registration with the Medical Independent includes granting consent for the delivery of that additional professional content and targeted ads, and the cookies required to deliver same. View our Privacy Policy and Cookie Notice for further details.

You can opt out at anytime by visiting our cookie policy page. In line with the provisions of the GDPR, the provision of your personal data is a requirement necessary to enter into a contract. We must advise you at the point of collecting your personal data that it is a required field, and the consequences of not providing the personal data is that we cannot provide this service to you.

Don't have an account? Subscribe

Mechanical restraint use in child and adolescent mental health centre ‘worrying’- MHC

By Mindo - 27th May 2021

The Inspector of Mental Health Services has said that the use of mechanical restraint in one of the country’s child and adolescent mental health centres is a worrying development.

The Inspector’s comments were made with respect to Linn Dara Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service in Dublin 10, one of three inspection reports published this morning by the Mental Health Commission (MHC) that together, identified four critical and 10 high risk non-compliances.

“The use of mechanical restraint in the form of soft cuffs for a young person in Linn Dara is of significant concern,” said Dr Susan Finnerty. “Nationally, the use of mechanical restraint is confined to the adult forensic mental health services and then only in very limited circumstances, involving transport to and from the Central Mental Hospital.

“That mechanical restraint is being used in the delivery of general mental health services – and particularly in a child and adolescent centres – is a worrying development,” she added.

“The personal costs to children and young people’s development and welfare and to staff from the use of restraint are well documented and international guidelines strongly recommend against mechanical restraint in children.

“Using positive behaviour support and other alternatives – which can de-escalate challenging behaviour and tackle the reasons for it at source – should always be the preferred approach.”

The Chief Executive of the Mental Health Commission, John Farrelly, echoed Dr Finnerty’s concern about the introduction of mechanical restraint into general services.

“Mechanical restraint is traumatic, countertherapeutic and dehumanising and has no place in a person-centred recovery focused mental health service, let alone in the care and treatment of a young person,” he said.

 Full report can be seen here

Leave a Reply

Latest Issue
The Medical Independent 26th September 2023

You need to be logged in to access this content. Please login or sign up using the links below.

Most Read