NOTE: By submitting this form and registering with us, you are providing us with permission to store your personal data and the record of your registration. In addition, registration with the Medical Independent includes granting consent for the delivery of that additional professional content and targeted ads, and the cookies required to deliver same. View our Privacy Policy and Cookie Notice for further details.

You can opt out at anytime by visiting our cookie policy page. In line with the provisions of the GDPR, the provision of your personal data is a requirement necessary to enter into a contract. We must advise you at the point of collecting your personal data that it is a required field, and the consequences of not providing the personal data is that we cannot provide this service to you.

Don't have an account? Subscribe

Concerns raised with ‘mandatory’ nature of open disclosure

By Mindo - 01st May 2019

Concerns were raised at the recent IMO AGM in Killarney, Co Kerry by the outgoing union President over Government plans to introduce mandatory open disclosure.

Speaking during a debate on a motion dealing with open disclosure, former IMO President and emergency medicine consultant Dr Peadar Gilligan said he had concerns with the proposed “mandatory” aspect of open disclosure that the Government is reportedly planning to introduce.

Dr Gilligan said he would rather see “supported and resourced open disclosure” rather than “mandatory”.

He told delegates that “anything that criminalises the interaction between a doctor and a patient is not in the interest of care. Hence my opposition to the concept of mandatory disclosure.”

He added that there was a difficulty with the mandating of open disclosure in a country that is so litigious,  “in a country that requires significant tort reform” and where he said the entire health service needs significant investment.

He said that the motion that mentioned “mandatory open disclosure” should instead read “supported and resourced open disclosure”. 

“The Patient Safety Bill is in the phase where it is open for discussion and I think it is incredibly important that the IMO inform that discussion,” said Dr Gilligan.

“We need not put the cart before the horse. We need to put the tort reform in place and the supports in place to first of all lessen the likelihood of an adverse event happening and then having done that we can look at ways of achieving open disclosure in ways that is efficient and focused.”

In the end, union delegates voted to refer the motion on open disclosure to the IMO Council for further discussion.

The HSE is currently reviewing its open disclosure policy following the recommendations of last year’s Scoping Inquiry into the CervicalCheck Screening Programme [Scally Report]. The Scally Report recommended the introduction of mandatory open disclosure. Last month a HSE spokesperson told the Medical Independent (MI) that this revision is a “priority piece of work”.

Mandatory open disclosure is also proposed as part of the Government’s upcoming Patient Safety Bill.

Leave a Reply

Latest Issue
The Medical Independent 20th February
The Medical Independent 20th February 2024

You need to be logged in to access this content. Please login or sign up using the links below.

Most Read