While social media is an important tool for public health education and connecting
with colleagues, Dr Edward Farnan outlines why it should be used with caution by medical professionals
The use of social media platforms such as WhatsApp, Twitter, Instagram, TikTok and Facebook has grown significantly over the years. The Covid-19 pandemic also increased our reliance on remote communication platforms at a time when face-to-face contact was limited.
The Medical Council told the Medical Independent in January 2023 that it was planning to update its guidance in the next edition of its Guide to Professional Conduct and Ethics for Registered Medical Practitioners, which is due for publication later this year. It is not clear what will change, but section 20 of the current version already covers the issue in some detail.
Concerns about online interactions are a constant theme in calls to the Medical Defence Union (MDU) with many doctors asking for help and advice about harnessing the benefits of social media to communicate with the public and colleagues while avoiding the pitfalls.
Here are five of the most common hazards and how to avoid them.
You would not disclose patients’ personal information in front of strangers in a hospital waiting room and the same principle applies in online communities. It goes without saying that publicly accessible social media sites should never be used to discuss individual patients or their care. But you should also be extremely cautious when using membership-only professional sites to discuss cases.
The Medical Council’s Guide says these can be a useful way to “share experiences and case studies, set up expert or learning groups, and get advice or help”. However, it adds that “as far as possible, you should not give information that would identify patients. You should also take reasonable steps to check that the network you are using has effective security settings and privacy policies, to minimise the risk of information about patients becoming more widely available.” (Paragraph 20.5)
When contributing to group discussions even on seemingly private groups or on apps, be very wary about posting pictures and/or clinical details to discussions, as once they have been uploaded to the group you have no control over what happens to them or how they are disseminated or used.
Patients may expect, and want, to use social media platforms and associated private messaging facilities to communicate with you.
However, by indicating a willingness to communicate on personal platforms rather than through traditional channels, you may blur the boundaries of your professional relationship. And if you provide your personal contact details to a patient, there is a risk that your intentions might be misunderstood.
Although it may initially be convenient to communicate with patients via direct messaging, a simple conversation about appointment availability (for example) could develop into a
clinical enquiry – or even escalate into a complaint.
Under the General Data Protection Regulation, health information is classified as ‘special category data’ and can only be processed if certain conditions are met. Special category data requires extra protection, and it is not appropriate for direct messages to contain health information unless this is in place.
For these reasons, we generally advise members to avoid communicating with patients through personal social networking sites, in line with Medical Council guidance.
Social media does not lend itself to nuanced argument, so it is not a good idea to use it to let off steam about a patient or colleague. Try not to get into a war of words, even if you feel provoked. Remember that others might have an entirely different view and things can escalate quickly. There are examples of people being reported to their employer or regulator for their online behaviour and you are likely to be held to higher standards as a doctor than the average member of the public.
The Medical Council warns: “You should always think about the possible impact on colleagues, patients or the public’s perception of the profession, before publishing comments on social media sites. You should treat patients and colleagues with respect and avoid abusive, unsustainable or malicious comments. You should make sure your comments are not defamatory or otherwise in breach of the law.” (Paragraph 20.2)
Doctors can play a valuable role in spreading reliable health information and debunking some inaccurate theories online.
However, problems can arise if you comment on issues outside your area of expertise or if you respond to individual requests for advice without access to the information you might normally have about the patient, such as the clinical records or the laws and regulations that apply in their country.
Advising individual patients about specific medical problems is likely to establish a duty of care and could allow a patient to pursue a clinical negligence claim or complaint against you. There is also a risk that your indemnity won’t extend to this situation.
The Medical Council’s Guide says “you must take all reasonable steps to make sure that any information or advice you give is accurate and valid”. It adds: You “should not make unsustainable claims for the effectiveness of treatments or exploit patients’ vulnerability or lack of medical knowledge”. (Paragraph 20.7)
Be extremely careful about endorsing products, especially if being paid to promote them as a social media influencer. This can give rise to a potential conflict of interest.
The Medical Council has specific ethical guidance on managing conflicts of interest which says: “If you are involved in any way in promoting or endorsing specific healthcare products or services, you must declare any financial or commercial interest you have in the organisation or company providing the products or services.” (Paragraph 62.7) In addition, the Medical Council expects you to identify yourself by name if you give clinical advice online and ensure information about your practice or the services you offer should be factual and verifiable. (Paragraphs 20.6-20.7)
It is important to abide by the Advertising Standards Authority for Ireland (ASAI) Code. The ASAI guidance note on influencer marketing states: “Where celebrities are sponsored by brands or paid directly to promote a brand’s products, it must be clear that their posts are marketing communications or others.”
MDU membership is designed for State-indemnified doctors and gives access to expert guidance with medico-legal dilemmas such as those related to social media. We can also support members with patient complaints, Medical Council investigations, inquests, and criminal matters. To find out more see www.themdu.com/ireland.
DR EDWARD FARNAN, Medico-legal Advisor, Medical Defence Union
The HSE has defined open disclosure as an open, consistent, compassionate, and timely approach to communicating...
The Judge's report proposes that a Tribunal be established under legislation to hear and determine claims...
In December, the HSE released part of an external review into the case of 'Brandon', a...
The evidence on doctor burnout “should scare us and concern us”, the Director of the RCSI...
A review of public health governance structures and addressing “longstanding” IT infrastructure...