NOTE: By submitting this form and registering with us, you are providing us with permission to store your personal data and the record of your registration. In addition, registration with the Medical Independent includes granting consent for the delivery of that additional professional content and targeted ads, and the cookies required to deliver same. View our Privacy Policy and Cookie Notice for further details.

You can opt out at anytime by visiting our cookie policy page. In line with the provisions of the GDPR, the provision of your personal data is a requirement necessary to enter into a contract. We must advise you at the point of collecting your personal data that it is a required field, and the consequences of not providing the personal data is that we cannot provide this service to you.

Don't have an account? Subscribe

Questions remain following pay review

By Mindo - 11th Sep 2018

The report of the Commission was eagerly awaited by stakeholders and was finally published last week. The fact that a body created to investigate pay did not think that pay was the key factor in recruitment difficulties understandably grabbed headlines, but, as ever with the health service, there are many nuances too.

With respect to consultants, the Commission does acknowledge the differential between the pay of new entrants and established consultants is greater than for other categories of public servant. The Commission believes that the implementation of the settlement of the 2008 Consultant Contract claim will further widen this pay differential. The Commission proposes that consideration needs to be given on what further measures could be taken to address the gap. Variation across certain specialties and locations suggests that there is a more significant problem recruiting in certain specialties and in certain locations. Additionally, the appointment of non-specialists to consultant posts was found to be a strong indication of recruitment challenges.

While the Commission points out there has been an increase in consultant numbers of 33 per cent from 2007 to 2017, it also finds the difference between serving numbers and the establishment number has declined, from a surplus of 41 in 2007, to a deficit of 169 in 2017. According to the report, this also suggests difficulties in filling approved positions.

A troubling aspect of the report was the Commission’s statement that it could not make a “definite conclusion” in respect of the retention of consultants due to the absence of good-quality data from employers. This echoes remarks by Dr Gabriel Scally about the difficulty in obtaining information from the HSE for his CervicalCheck Inquiry.

The Commission’s report was intended to provide definitive answers on what has been a long-running problem in the Irish health service. However, the Commission’s ability to provide those answers has been hampered by data deficits that continue to make the workforce planning efforts for the health service less than ideal. Although medical unions might have been hoping for something stronger, at least the report does point a way forward for doctors and means that the new-entrant salary controversy remains on the political agenda.

Leave a Reply

Latest Issue
The Medical Independent 20th February 2024

You need to be logged in to access this content. Please login or sign up using the links below.

Most Read