NOTE: By submitting this form and registering with us, you are providing us with permission to store your personal data and the record of your registration. In addition, registration with the Medical Independent includes granting consent for the delivery of that additional professional content and targeted ads, and the cookies required to deliver same. View our Privacy Policy and Cookie Notice for further details.

You can opt out at anytime by visiting our cookie policy page. In line with the provisions of the GDPR, the provision of your personal data is a requirement necessary to enter into a contract. We must advise you at the point of collecting your personal data that it is a required field, and the consequences of not providing the personal data is that we cannot provide this service to you.

Don't have an account? Subscribe

Co-operation a must in CervicalCheck inquiry

By Mindo - 19th Jun 2018

While a large part of the inquiry involves the Vicky Phelan case and the non-disclosure of clinical audit results, it has also been asked to “examine all aspects of CervicalCheck”, assess the accreditation and quality assurance of contracted cytology services, and look at other screening programmes operated by the National Screening Service.

Comprehensively examining all of these areas in six-to-seven weeks would have been asking a lot. Instead, Dr Gabriel Scally has said that the final report of the inquiry will be issued at the end of the summer. This appears to be a more reasonable time-frame to get clarity on what has been one of the biggest public health controversies of recent times.

The most troubling contributing factor to the delay is the difficulty Dr Scally has experienced in obtaining the information he requires. Documentation, totalling 4,000 items, was only provided to the inquiry at the beginning of June. A significant proportion of these comprised scanned documents from hard copies, which means they are non-searchable and also difficult to read. Dr Scally stated it is “disappointing and unclear” why documents that would originally have been prepared in electronic format are not available to the inquiry in that format, rather than a scanned version of the printed copy. Also, the inquiry does not have access to the names and contact addresses of the 209 women who developed cervical cancer or the relatives of those who have died. Vicky Phelan’s lawyer has said that CervicalCheck appears to have “a policy of obstruction”.

Failures in transparency were the very reason the inquiry was set up in the first place. Now the Minister for Health Simon Harris has confirmed that a full Commission of Investigation will be established in September, which will have the power to compel evidence.

The Minister’s announcement, as well as the glare of media and political scrutiny on Dr Scally’s first two reports and subsequent comments, shows this issue will not fade into the background. The HSE and CervicalCheck should be aware by now that there is little room to hide and that nothing less than full co-operation with the scoping inquiry and the Commission of Investigation will be tolerated.

Leave a Reply

Latest Issue
The Medical Independent 20th February 2024

You need to be logged in to access this content. Please login or sign up using the links below.

Most Read