NOTE: By submitting this form and registering with us, you are providing us with permission to store your personal data and the record of your registration. In addition, registration with the Medical Independent includes granting consent for the delivery of that additional professional content and targeted ads, and the cookies required to deliver same. View our Privacy Policy and Cookie Notice for further details.



Don't have an account? Subscribe

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Absence of clinicians on HSE board widely criticised

By Mindo - 07th Feb 2019

Several medical and other healthcare professionals took to social media forums to question what they described as lack of medical knowledge on the board when the announcement was made by Minister for Health Simon Harris. There are no appointees from a medical or nursing background.

Prof Anthony Staines, who applied for board membership but was not appointed, told the Medical Independent that while all appointees were very capable and reasonable choices, the only person who had significant knowledge of the health system was healthcare law expert Prof Deirdre Madden.

He noted that other healthcare boards had a “good balance” of members with various expertise but this was not the case with the new HSE board.

“If you look at an engineering company, for instance, you would expect to see an engineer on the board,” Prof Staines said.

“There is nobody on the board that knows the organisation, and that worries me. It shouldn’t be made up of all clinical personnel either, but I think there’s a balance that needs to be struck.”

He maintained that the main issues for the board should be accountability, governance and a patient-centred culture.

The NAGP also released a statement criticising the lack of clinicians on the board.

Meanwhile, GP Dr Mark Murphy, who also applied for a position on the board, has published his application letter on social media.

In it, he outlined several major challenges that he felt should be addressed by the new board, including the failure of some HSE governance structures, poor data collection processes, low staff morale and inadequate media communication.

Dr Murphy said the CervicalCheck controversy demonstrated “what can happen when inappropriate marketing and over-simplistic messaging dominates discourse, creating opportunities for toxic populism”.

He also warned that HSE cost over-runs would continue unless the organisation tackled “populist policies”, which lack any evidence-base.

Leave a Reply

ADVERTISEMENT

Latest

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Issue
medical independent 2nd April
The Medical Independent 2nd April 2024

You need to be logged in to access this content. Please login or sign up using the links below.

ADVERTISEMENT

Most Read

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT