Skip to content

You are reading 1 of 2 free-access articles allowed for 30 days

Edoxaban is non-inferior to VKAs in patients with AF after TAVI

There has been little information on the safety of direct-acting oral anticoagulants compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) following successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). In a Hot Line session at the ESC 2021 Congress, Prof George Dangas (Zena and Michael A Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, US) presented results from the multi-centre, open-label ENVISAGE-TAVI AF study, in which patients with AF and an anticoagulation indication were randomised to receive edoxaban or the locally available VKA (warfarin or its analogues), each administered between 12 hours and five days following TAVI. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of net adverse clinical events (NACE), a composite of allcause death, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, systemic thromboembolism, valve thrombosis, and major bleeding (as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis [ISTH]).

The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of ISTH-defined major bleeding. The average age of the 1,426 participants was 82 years and 47.5 per cent were women. Comorbidities were common: 83-to-87 per cent had congestive heart failure, 39-to-42 per cent had coronary artery disease, and approximately 17 per cent had a previous stroke or transient ischaemic event.At an average follow-up of 18 months, edoxaban demonstrated non-inferiority to VKAs for the primary efficacy endpoint, with NACE rates of 17.5 per cent per year in the edoxaban group and 16.5 per cent per year in the VKA group (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.31; p=0.01 for non-inferiority).

However, there was a higher risk of major bleeding in the edoxaban group compared with the VKA group (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.91), with rates of 9.7 per cent per year and 7.0 per cent per year, respectively. The higher risk was mainly due to gastrointestinal bleeding. In secondary analyses, patients in the edoxaban group who required a downward dose adjustment and those not prescribed oral antiplatelet therapy had a similar rate of major bleeding as those in the VKA group.Summarising the findings, Prof Dangas commented: “ENVISAGE-TAVI AF suggests that treatment with edoxaban can be valuable in the management of this high-risk population of patients with AF after TAVI. We need to be attentive to the higher bleeding risks with edoxaban. Based on secondary analyses, it seems that lowering the edoxaban dosage when indicated and avoiding patients on mandatory antiplatelet therapy is reasonable safety advice from a clinical point of view. We will be conducting a detailed analysis on specific types of bleeding in the near future.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Scroll To Top